Carers of people with dementia
Respect with dementia
Before people get labelled as a person with dementia, they have the right to confidentiality, privacy and respect, like everyone else. When they become ill these rights become confused and in some cases lost.
Here, carers discuss the problems they have in trying to maintain an ethical position towards the person with dementia and also do justice to the wishes that person expressed before they became ill.
One of the earliest conflicts for the carer concerns confidentiality. Several carers, particularly those who did not live near to the relative they suspected might be developing dementia, ran into trouble when they tried to get information about their relative from a doctor or social worker. One carer reported how a GP had insisted that he would discuss with her mother whether she should take medication or not although the daughter knew that her mother was unable to understand or remember such a discussion. She described how the doctor at hospital had asked her mother whether she minded her sitting in on their consultation and so got round the problem of confidentiality.
The carer may eventually have to make decisions on behalf of the person with dementia and bear the responsibility of deciding on the best interests of that person. This is difficult for the carer who might wish that it was possible to ask for permission from the person the decision is going to affect.
Carers who have known and loved the person with dementia before they became ill may be very conscious that one of the results of the illness is that they have become negligent about things that in former times they minded about. Several carers felt sure that it was right to make efforts to see that their relative was neat and clean, even elegant if that is what they used to be. As dementia progressed it often became difficult to maintain their visits to the hairdressers, or to persuade them to accept changes of clothes. One carer described her acceptance that there were advantages in allowing her mother to dress as eccentrically as she wished, raising the possibility that too rigid respect for her former self was not helpful in coming to terms with who she was now.
A less difficult form of respect for the former person took the form of trying to continue to do things the way they would have liked it. However several carers describe the problems they had when they tried to carry on activities which they had enjoyed with their partner or parent before the onset of dementia. There were visits to concerts ending in the carer losing their companion during a visit to the toilet. One carer describes how for a time she could let her husband continue to go to the golf club.
Has to decide whether in allowing her husband freedom she is taking an unacceptable risk.
Has to decide whether in allowing her husband freedom she is taking an unacceptable risk.
My husband still plays golf, he has a group, mainly from church who collect him, out of great kindness and play golf and bring him back again. Now for various reasons that they're a lot older, their health is failing, the whole system is beginning to fall apart and there is the option to go to a much closer golf course, which it would be easier to get a taxi, or me to do one way or whatever. But it would mean going as an individual and picking up a partner on spec. Now that is potentially a minefield, given my husband's condition.
Now I was faced with, do I dig my heels in and try and persuade him not to pursue something that's very important to him and gives him a lot of pleasure, or do I risk knowing that the thing might become unstuck. He might play with someone who doesn't know he's got that disease, he might do something unacceptable, or react in an inappropriate fashion, and then I've got to unscramble that. And again I, I chose, I think we have to live with risk. We have to live with risk and its just deciding what's an acceptable risk, and I decided that was. And actually it came horribly unstuck, on one occasion.
Some carers worried that it was wrong to talk about a person's condition behind their back. But many had felt it necessary to inform some outsiders that the person they were caring for had problems with their memory. In some cases the result was an increase in support and friendliness from neighbours and local tradesmen.
Does not have a problem with disclosing her partner's condition to people.
Does not have a problem with disclosing her partner's condition to people.
How did you feel about telling people about your partner's dementia? You said that you had a very positive response when you did.
I had no problems with that at all because, by his own, by his own actions and. His own, the way he was acting people, when I actually told them they said 'Well we knew there was something not quite right, but we didn't know what it was.' They would ask him something and he would, or try and have a conversation with him and of course it was impossible even going back three, four years to have a conversation with him. And so people who tried to have a conversation with him knew that there was something wrong and they were quite relieved when I actually said what was wrong.
It didn't worry me at all. I didn't feel any shame or didn't feel, it was just this is what was happening and the more people knew about it, the easier it was for me to cope with what you know with what he was doing. And of course everybody made allowances for him and I mean people still talk to him, although he doesn't answer them. They still address him, which I find very good. Yeah, I would hate for him just to be ignored as if he wasn't there any more. I mean he's not in some ways, but we don't know how much of him is still there. This is the awful thing. If you could say well part of his brain is still functioning and he knows when people talk to him and he knows this and he knows that it would be easier, but we don't.
He understands certain things and then when you think he's going to understand he obviously doesn't because he just stands and looks absolutely blank at you as if he hasn't a clue what you've just said to him. So I had no problems with telling people. In fact it was a relief to me because the more people I told the more people I was able to talk to, and the more supportive people were. The CPN always used to say to me 'You're very open about it aren't you?' And I said 'Well, it's the only way I can cope. I can't hide it.' There's no way you can hide it.
One carer who is a doctor describes the legal and medical reasons why he thinks information has to be shared with other people.
Discusses his feelings about disclosing his mother's dementia and speculates on whether she should have a right to privacy.
Discusses his feelings about disclosing his mother's dementia and speculates on whether she should have a right to privacy.
I've had to tell various people that she's got dementia in order to for instance to sort out her financial affairs. And it's not something that's unknown in society and most of these places it's simply an operational reason for them to change things and so that's it. I've never felt unwilling to explain to other people that my mum's got dementia. I think at work I've told some people and I haven't told others.
So I try and respect her privacy in that sense, I'll only tell somebody if I feel it's necessary for them to know in order to explain for instance why I'm not there or can't do something. I suppose I use it as a justification in those terms which might be slightly wrong. But no I've not really felt that it was a, it was a problem.
Because looking after somebody with dementia is a team based activity and that requires a lot of people with a lot of different skills and I think then, it's, it's often means that you know the details of the illness and problems are more widely known maybe than another disease. But then you can argue that the person, the patient themselves doesn't mind. Now that's difficult because obviously ethically it doesn't matter what they think, it's a bit like psychiatric illnesses and just because a patient doesn't appreciate there's an ethical issue involved doesn't absolve us from taking responsibility for that. I think again I've been so sort of wrapped up in the emotional caring and financial and organisational issues that it's not been at the top of my list of priorities I have to say. But it's an interesting question now you've raised it. I would also feel that that looking after came first, and I'd worry about the ethical issues afterwards. But that's, that is a pragmatic view which might be mine rather than other people's.
Last reviewed: November 2023
Last updated March 2015.
Copyright © 2024 University of Oxford. All rights reserved.

