Neil
Neil was the primary carer of his partner, who had dementia. Neil’s partner was initially reluctant to go to the doctor’s when Neil noticed that he was experiencing memory issues. His partner was diagnosed with medium-term dementia. Due to changes in his partner’s behaviour, Neil’s partner was sectioned twice before being placed in a care home.
Neil used to care for his partner who had dementia. When Neil originally suspected his partner had dementia he suggested that they visit the doctors together, as his partner was resistant to seeing the doctor. Upon visiting the doctor, Neil’s partner was diagnosed with medium-term dementia. Neil suspects his partner had been exhibiting dementia symptoms for 10 years before his diagnosis.
Due to his dementia symptoms, Neil’s partner experienced changes in behaviour that became difficult to support. Subsequently, hospital staff informed Neil that they would need to section his partner. Neil’s partner was sectioned twice before he was discharged to a care home. Neil visited his partner while he was in the care home and found staff attitudes toward people from the LGBTQ+ community negatively affected his partner’s care. He advocated on his partner’s behalf to improve care and ensure that his partner received the support he needed.
Neil self-funded his partner’s care using his savings as he did not have access to his partner’s savings and current account. Three days after his partner died, Neil was awarded a Court of Protection order giving him access to his partner’s savings. However, upon his partner’s death, his partner’s accounts were frozen. After speaking to a friend, Neil approached the Clinical Commissioning Group to investigate whether his partner had been entitled to free care. After contacting his local MP about the issue, the Clinical Commissioning Group found that their assessment showed that Neil should not have had to pay for his partner’s care.