June

June’s husband self-funded care from age 75.

June cared for her husband at home after he had a stroke. He later went into hospital following a fall and was diagnosed with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Having looked after her husband for 5 years, June was advised to arrange paid care workers to support her.

June would have liked to arrange some occasional respite care for her husband as she was exhausted being his sole carer. The local council adult social care department gave her a list of care homes but no help in finding one that could provide respite care. The care homes wanted full-time paying residents. June found this frustrating because when you self-fund your care, people say you get more choice, but June felt abandoned and could not get the help she wanted.

June’s husband, John, was living with PSP, a rare neurological degenerative disease that leads to slowness of thought, dysphagia and poor mobility, sight and speech. This was diagnosed during a spell in hospital after falling. The hospital social worker advised June to arrange some paid care at home. June found a care agency that was expensive but she felt the quality of care was very good. To start with, the care workers visited 2 hours each week to give June a break and gradually she increased their hours as her husband’s needs increased.

John received higher rate Attendance Allowance which helped towards the cost of care. Also, June was told that they would be entitled to a reduction in council tax because of her husband’s disabilities. June had a bedroom and shower room built on the ground floor because it was no longer safe for John to go upstairs. The cost of the building extension was paid for out of John’s savings and, because the new room was purpose built to meet his disability needs, their council tax was reduced by one band.

Following another fall 2 years later, John spent 5 weeks in hospital with a broken pelvis and then moved to a rehabilitation unit. After 6 weeks in rehabilitation, the family were informed that John was “bed-blocking” and they had to quickly find a suitable care home with nursing. June was told that because of his healthcare needs, John would be entitled to NHS-funded nursing care, which is a contribution towards the nursing home fees. John was initially refused NHS continuing healthcare funding (CHC) but the social workers asked for the decision to be reviewed and, after a few months of waiting, June found out that John would get his full care fees funded through CHC.

Interviewed online due to 2020 COVID-19 restrictions.

The nursing home delayed charging June’s husband until the CHC application process was completed.

Age at interview 72

Gender Female

June describes continuing healthcare and funded nursing care.

Age at interview 72

Gender Female

June’s daughter complained to the manager of the care home about her father’s care.

Age at interview 72

Gender Female

June found a home nearby so that she and her daughter could visit everyday.

Age at interview 72

Gender Female

June asked the social worker for help when her husband was being discharged from hospital.

Age at interview 72

Gender Female

June did not feel supported in trying to get respite care for her husband.

Age at interview 72

Gender Female