Frances

Frances’ father self-funded care from age 77.

When Frances could not find suitable accommodation for her father and his dog, she decided to sell their family home and her father’s house and purchase a house together. They paid for care at home for 4 years until he moved to a nursing care home.

Frances’s father was living with dementia and after Frances’s mother died it became clear that her father was not eating well. When Frances was working full-time she asked friends to pop round to check on him and her 20-year old son began to stay with him. They looked for supported housing but could not find a place where he could keep his dog, which was very important to him. The family decided he should live with them but they would need a bigger house. Frances sold the family house as well as her father’s and they purchased somewhere together.

Frances gave up her full-time job to look after her father five days a week. They paid for care for 2 full days when she was out at work. This arrangement worked out well for a few years. Quite suddenly, Frances’s father stopped sleeping and there was a risk that he would go out at night. Frances looked for overnight care at home but it was double the cost, which was not affordable. She applied for help from her local council adult social care department but her father’s pension was over the threshold for help with funding. Frances’s lack of sleep started to take its toll and she arranged some respite care for her father. Unfortunately, challenging behaviours led to him being admitted to a psychiatric hospital for 6 months. When his condition was more stable he was moved to residential care and was awarded Continuing Health Care (CHC) funding. Frances was aware that CHC could be withdrawn if her father’s condition improved.

Frances’s family had concerns about how care would be paid for and, although she could have applied to defer the payments for her father’s care fees, this would have incurred interest, plus there would be a time limit on when the fees would have to be paid. This uncertainty around payments was distressing for Frances and she made the decision to sell the family home to release her father’s share of the capital. She felt that although there are systems in place to protect the value of the home between husband and wife, or partners, the process for families living together is complicated and she felt that no one understood her situation.

Frances and her father used the money to buy a house together so that he could live with her.

Age at interview 52

Gender Female

Frances realised how much caring for her dad was affecting her family life when he had respite care.

Age at interview 52

Gender Female

Frances refused to pay for someone to look after her dad while she was at a carers group.

Age at interview 52

Gender Female

Frances told us how good the Alzheimer’s Society fact sheets were.

Age at interview 52

Gender Female

Frances told us that in future they’d use the internet before asking the local council.

Age at interview 52

Gender Female

Frances owned a house with her father which made the financial assessment complicated.

Age at interview 52

Gender Female

Frances still did the cleaning for her mum even though she could have paid for this with Attendance Allowance.

Age at interview 52

Gender Female

Frances talks about the range of benefits and discounts available.

Age at interview 52

Gender Female

Frances decided to sell the family home rather than arrange a deferred payment agreement.

Age at interview 52

Gender Female